Open Innovation, Collective Intelligence & Web Science

Collab 

“Most of what i know is in the heads of my friends.” 

Last night I saw a discussion on MIT about collective intelligence. They dicuss issues such as privacy, security, mass collaboration and sociology. Very interesting stuff, its two hours long but an inspirational watch!

I also listened to a Tim Berners Lee talk given at the CCI at MIT about Web Science, the semantic web & collective intelligence. Tim provides some unique perspectives on the link between the logical and social aspects of websites, collective decision making processes and web standards.

Also take a look at PonokoZazzle ++ as a recent example of an open innovation space. I think business models such as this will be the future of manufacturing as a whole. It is much more sensible that ideas come from the public and are translated into products manufactured by those which can leverage economies of scale, speed and procurement compentencies which they possess. A technology review post about Ponoko can be found here.

Open Innovation – The Indians are coming

Earth 

What a great (and scary) idea that the Indians are proposing here:

“Imagine over 350,000 engineers pass out every year hoping to get jobs and according to industry bodies only over 20% are employable.  That’s a real challenge. Now imagine this. We create a startup that is built on a principle of open innovation. Every year we throw up a 1000 ideas that we can see are gaps from internet to telecommunications and finance to healthcare for global markets including that in India. We then throw open this opportunity on an annual basis to 400,000 students including professionals who work across industries in India to collaborate on these ideas (and they can do the opposite or their own). We then connect them to mentors and investors of time and capital and they have just 3 months to plan and prototype their ideas or technologies or businesses. The ones who make it through are ready and then we have a portfolio of over 200 companies (assume 80% die) annually to take to the next step.

So now people don’t have to have only one option, to just look for jobs.They can become wealth creators and this way we can kick start global innovation out of India. We can connect these ideas and startups to other clusters of innovation, ideas, investors and markets and other opportunities to collaborate and we have a pretty powerful opportunity here.

Even if these 400,000 students invest $100 each we then raise over $40m a year VC fund from their own fraternity and those who don’t start continue to participate as investors in people whose ideas have survived the Darwinism! This also means on an average every one of these startups get to over $200,000 seed fund from their fellow alumni and social networks. Here is an opportunity to create wealth for all.

If we do this annually we create wealth, jobs, opportunities and more importantly help make India very competitive as a nation for the next 100 years and in the process leapfrog and leverage all the good work that the services companies inIndia have done over the last 20 years.This also means that instead of doing engineering or masters projects just for academic sake and a must do, now people have the opportunity to go to the next level.

What’s the worst case? There isn’t one. People learn so much they become good enough anyway to get a job and employable from day one. What’s the best case? We create billion dollar global companies year on year and then there is no stopping the great talent that India and the world has.The idea? Democratize innovation and investing bottom up….and may a thousand Talpiots, Stanfords and IITs bloom.”

Sounds great, but excluding open source software and a few other products, the problem persists as to how to actually coordinate 350,000 people in an online environment to faciliate development. This will come in time when technologies will faciliate the tools required for all types of different products to be developed, tested and prototyped virtually. Perhaps such an undertaking should be part of the broader framework of offline group collaboration such as IBM Developerworks (for which they rejected my application!) or the Elgg movement. I have my own ideas how we can improve online collaborations which I will reveal in a later post.

Post stolen from: http://blog.nasscom.in/emerge/2007/11/06/part-2-and-an-open-business-plan-bottom-up-lets-unleash-creative-destruction/

Open Innovation & Diggs

               Innovation

         

The field of open innovation is nothing new but is heating up with the lunch and uptake of numerous new initiatives.

                 

<!–more Organisations are increasingly opening up their four walls to customers, academic institutions and the general public as a means to source incremental product innovations and branch out into new markets. The following list are Open (or closed) Innovation sites which I bumped into:

www.crowdspirit.com
www.dellideastorm.com
www.employeesuggestoinbox.com
www.fevote.com
www.fellowforce.com
www.getsatisfaction.com
www.innocentive.com
www.ninesigma.com
www.pligg.com
www.salesforce.com/products/ideas
suggestions.yahoo.com

The basic premise of Open Innovation here is to offer a forum facility to post suggestions/problems with digg functionality to bubble the best suggestions to the top. Sites such as Fellowforce, Salesforce, Dell, Yahoo suggestions, employeesuggestionbox and Fevote in an attempt to tap that Digg goldrush enable developers to embed boxes (input box & linked forum) within their site to allow visitors to post suggestions about products, code, projects or applications. These suggestions are then aggregated and voted upon. Such sites are mainly to advance existing products incrementally rather than inventing entirely new products/applications. 

Employeesuggestionbox appears to be the only provider to take the initial idea to a product development stage enabled by the support of project management facilities. Crowdspirit is targeted toward the consumer electronics market (mp3 players, web cams, accessories, etc) with digg functionality rewarding inspired individuals with revenues if products are developed. The long standing Innocentive and Ninesigma is focused to harness the potentials of their academic and commercial R&D relationships to develop solutions for science based products.

Open Innovation in the form of suggestion boxes/forums coupled with a digg appears to be solving real problems, especially for software applications where there are a large number of users. It would be interesting to see how such services could be applied to the fields of politics and the environment!–>

Hello world!

Head ScratchMy first post on wordpress!

It comes to my attention that I should start blogging my daily antics to digest the information which I collect and spit it back out to you. I am most interested in web startups, everything ’social’, that cursed ‘web 2.0′ hype phrase, online collaboration and other general technology rants. Speaking of rants, let us begin with the first:

What’s bothering me recently as I spend hours digging around online about the latest developments of the web world is the problem of the so called curve. You read your daily RSS, you open links from friends, you hear about developments through IM, email, forums, newsgroups - you get the idea. The question arises as to what really are we all chasing? Why is there this inherent need to try and get a sense of where things are going? I suspect we do it for mainly curiosity, for the fun of learning, and to perhaps come up with the next best startup.

While I can see potential benefits of being ahead of the curve, the greatest of which being the financial gains acquired for exploiting newly emerged potential, I fail to see how we can gauge how far up or down the curve we are. There is such a wealth of information out there on a daily basis it seems as if we only have time to get a snapshot of big news and largely ignore the rest. How can we ever really know ahead of time of developments such as the launch of Whrrl when their launch date is the time when everyone hears about it? Why for example if I visit the traffic rankings for the domain on Alexa, has it been active since mid August? Surely this is evidence that people get wind of information before the masses. What are we missing?